Phase 92024

Spectral Gap Verification

After 12 years of dead ends, we focused on what we could actually verify. The spectral gap study began with a small passing fixture, then expanded into a boundary map with explicit counterexamples.

Run 2024, re-scoped 2026-07-26S-ID: S01

Spectral-Gap Boundary Audit

Reproducible local testing with a normal-operator guard, including passing cases and counterexamples.

Scope: 3 distinct baseline compositions pass, while the guarded grid audit finds 9 counterexamples. No general safety guarantee is claimed.

3/3 distinct
Original Fixture Cases

Earlier wording said 5/5 non-trivial; two of the five repeat another case (see table)

79/88
Guarded Grid Cases Passed

912 non-normal cases were refused as out of scope

9 counterexamples
General Claim Refuted

5 Dirichlet and 4 periodic Schrodinger/Laplacian mixes; worst ratio 0.21

Verification Methodology

Step 1
Formalize Scheme Space

Defined discretization schemes as (L_h, R_h, E_h) triples

Step 2
Search Literature

Found Symanzik improvement program in lattice QCD

Step 3
Test Spectral Gap

Characterized the passing subclass and reproduced 9 counterexamples

Step 4
Clean Example

D_BG[x^n] = exp(n) analytically provable

Scoped Spectral-Gap Evidence

The original result file contains five composed-gap checks, but in that file the "compact" operator has exactly the 3-point gap, so "3-point + compact" is a self-composition and "5-point + compact" repeats "3-point + 5-point". That leaves 3 distinct checks. Four first-derivative entries have zero real-part spacing and are marked as not being spectral gaps, so they are not counted either. Gaps are in units of 1/h^2 with n = 50.

CompositionMinimum componentComposedStatus
3-point + 5-point Laplacian29.56229.678PASS
3-point + compact Laplacianself-composition (compact == 3-point here)29.56229.562PASS (not distinct)
5-point + compact Laplacianrepeats 3-point + 5-point29.56229.678PASS (not distinct)
All three Laplacians29.56229.640PASS
3-point + 5-point diffusion29.60129.717PASS

Boundary result: The guarded grid rerun accepted 88 normal-operator compositions: 79 passed and 9 counterexamples failed the proposed bound. Another 912 non-normal compositions were refused because this diagnostic is not valid for them. This is an empirical subclass observation and boundary map, not a theorem or a general solver guarantee.

Interactive Demonstrations

Connection to Established Frameworks

Symanzik Improvement Program

The ALPHA Collaboration at DESY-Zeuthen developed systematic methods to reduce discretization errors in lattice QCD. Our multi-scheme averaging relates to their approach of adding counterterms to cancel O(a) errors.

ALPHA Collaboration - Symanzik Improvement ->

Spectral-Gap Boundary (NOT Enhancement)

The spectral gap between eigenvalues determines convergence rates for diffusion and mixing processes. The baseline shows averaging for selected Laplacian-family compositions, while the guarded grid audit contains 9 counterexamples.

Data: diffusion composed gap 29.717 vs minimum component 29.601 (ratio 1.004)

arXiv: Spectral Gap for Discrete Operators ->

Non-Newtonian Calculus (Grossman)

The bigeometric derivative D_BG[x^n] = exp(n) is a known result from Grossman's bigeometric calculus (1983). Our contribution is the constancy diagnostic application and MOO-based verification.

Grossman, M. "Bigeometric Calculus" (1983)

Honest Assessment

What We CAN Claim

  • +D_BG[x^n] = exp(n) is analytically provable
  • +3 distinct baseline cases pass; the broader normal-operator claim has 9 counterexamples
  • +Constancy diagnostic identifies function class
  • +The boundary map is a reproducible 1000-case grid search

What Remains Uncertain

  • ?No governing equation or symmetry group
  • ?Spectral gap result is empirical, not proven generally
  • ?Cosmological implications not rigorously established
  • ?Not a replacement for established methods

Technical Details

Test Configuration

  • Grid size: n = 50
  • Schemes: 3-point, 5-point, compact
  • Operators: Laplacian, First derivative, Diffusion
  • Boundary map: 1000-case grid, normal-operator guard

Source Files

  • simulations/spectral_gap_verification.py
  • simulations/moo_invariance_analysis_v2.py
  • docs/RIGOROUS_FORMALIZATION.md
  • docs/CONSTANCY_DIAGNOSTIC_DISCOVERY.md