A blowup, read as a straight line.

u(t) = (T* - t)-beta races to infinity at T*. Measure it in multiplicative arithmetic, the bigeometric calculus, and the same curve is a line whose slope is the exponent. For a power law the readout is an identity: D_BG[xn] = en on x > 0.

u(t) = (T* - t)-beta, computed in your browser. Same curve, same tick marks; only the arithmetic of the axes changes.
time t
-
u(t)
-
du/dt (classical)
-
elasticity
-
D_BG = e^elasticity
-
note
elasticity = d ln u / d ln(T* - t). du/dt climbs without bound; the elasticity sits on -beta.

This is a diagnostic. u still reaches infinity at T*; the readout measures the exponent of the law and leaves the singularity where it is.

Reading a blowup law

Hand the lens a record that stops short of T*. It fits log f against log(T* - t) with T* left free and reports what the record is consistent with: a power b on this window. Below, the Burgers analyticity-strip width, an exact law with b = 1.5 at T* = 1, sits next to a smooth mimic that stays bounded. Drag the record closer to T* and watch both fits agree.

Every exponent at once

The hero curve, for every beta from 0.25 to 3, as one sheet. Slide it from the classical chart to the log chart and, on the same vertices, every slice straightens into a line of slope beta. Then step to the data horizon.

loading the 3D view
after the recordthe recordBurgers 1/deltabounded mimic1e-21e-31e-41e-51 - t, log scale, toward T* = 1
On the record the two differ by at most 2.33%; past the last sample the gap grows.
Burgers 1/delta(t), exact strip-width law
fit T* = 1.00001, fit b = 1.509
consistent with power b = 1.509 on this window
Truth: delta reaches 0 at t = 1 (b = 1.5).
mimic (s^2 + eps^2)^(-3/4), eps = 1.00e-4
fit T* = 1.00001, fit b = 1.501
consistent with power b = 1.501 on this window
Truth: smooth everywhere; its maximum 1.06e6 sits at t = 1.

A cascade, and a law you can tune

Sample u' = up up to a cutoff, optionally with a log-periodic ripple from a geometric cascade (ratio 2 gives omega = 2 pi / ln 2, about 9.07). The fitted T* and b come from the log-log fit; the elasticity panel is a diagnostic view only. With 1% multiplicative Gaussian noise on 160 samples (p = 2, cutoff 99%, 50 seeded trials), the fit reads b with RMS error 0.0012, while the elasticity curve read point by point is off by 0.24 RMS. The ripple spacing in the elasticity returns the cascade ratio.

Time view: the record, and two futures that fit it
after the recordtrue T*time t0.6200.6671510
Diagnostic view: elasticity d ln u / d ln(T* - t) at the fitted T*
true -b = -1.000-0.51-1.501e-21e-1T* - t, log scale, toward T*
true T*
0.6667
fit T*
0.6664 (-0.04%)
true b, 1/(p-1)
1.0000
fit b
0.9951
ripple ratio set
2.00
ripple ratio from elasticity
2.01
samples
160
bounded future sup
193.0

The mirror

Take the theta function of a lattice, theta(alpha) = sum of exp(-pi alpha |x|2) over every lattice point, origin included, and read its elasticity in the log chart. For any isodual lattice in d dimensions, e(s) + e(-s) = -d/2 exactly, so in 2D the curve is point-symmetric about (0, -1/2). This is classical Jacobi/Poisson duality, seen through the lens. Computed at build time by tested code.

loading the 3D view
e(s) = d ln theta / d ln alpha, s = ln alpha. Center of the mirror: (0, -1/2).
-3-2-101230.0-0.5-1.0s = ln alpha

triangular, square (grey), honeycomb, and the honeycomb reflected through (0, -1/2) (red dashes). A mirror-exact curve lands on its own reflection.

FCC vs BCC in 3D: (theta_FCC - theta_BCC) / theta_FCC on the grid s in [-3, 3]
-3-2-101231e-30-1e-3s = ln alpha
triangular: max |e(s) + e(-s) + 1|
5.8e-15
mirror-exact
square: max |e(s) + e(-s) + 1|
4.2e-15
mirror-exact
honeycomb: max |e(s) + e(-s) + 1|
0.068
not a lattice: the mirror breaks (dashed = its reflection)
FCC vs BCC at s = 0
2e-15 apart
tie at s = 0, order swaps across it (grid only)

Two dimension meters on one torus

On the unit cubic 3-torus, two elasticities read off a dimension. The ball, cylinder and slab candidate envelope for the isoperimetric profile, drawn for enclosed volumes up to one half (beyond that the complement of each region is the better candidate), steps 2/3, 1/2, 0. The heat trace slides from -3/2 to 0 with no plateau between. Same space: one meter steps, the other slides.

candidate-envelope elasticity d ln I / d ln v, v <= 1/2
1e-41e-31e-21e-10.52/31/20enclosed volume v, log scale
heat-trace elasticity d ln Z / d ln t
1e-41e-31e-21e-11e01e1-3/2-1/20diffusion time t, log scale